This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TA0037
Case T-37/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Stirlinx Arkadiusz Kamusiński v EUIPO — Heinrich Bauer Verlag (Brave Paper) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Brave Paper — Earlier national word mark BRAVO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Conceptual similarity)
Case T-37/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Stirlinx Arkadiusz Kamusiński v EUIPO — Heinrich Bauer Verlag (Brave Paper) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Brave Paper — Earlier national word mark BRAVO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Conceptual similarity)
Case T-37/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Stirlinx Arkadiusz Kamusiński v EUIPO — Heinrich Bauer Verlag (Brave Paper) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Brave Paper — Earlier national word mark BRAVO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Conceptual similarity)
OJ C 230, 8.7.2019, p. 36–36
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
8.7.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 230/36 |
Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Stirlinx Arkadiusz Kamusiński v EUIPO — Heinrich Bauer Verlag (Brave Paper)
(Case T-37/18) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Brave Paper - Earlier national word mark BRAVO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Conceptual similarity)
(2019/C 230/44)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Stirlinx Arkadiusz Kamusiński (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Pruszczyk, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Heinrich Bauer Verlag KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: U. Grübler, S. Engels and C. Engelmann, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 November 2017 (Case R 391/2017-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Heinrich Bauer Verlag and Stirlinx Arkadiusz Kamusiński.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Stirlinx Arkadiusz Kamusiński to pay the costs. |