EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018CN0794
Case C-794/18 P: Appeal brought on 17 December 2018 by Pracsis SPRL, Conceptexpo Project against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 3 October 2018 in Case T-33/18, Pracsis and Conceptexpo Project v Commission and EACEA
Case C-794/18 P: Appeal brought on 17 December 2018 by Pracsis SPRL, Conceptexpo Project against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 3 October 2018 in Case T-33/18, Pracsis and Conceptexpo Project v Commission and EACEA
Case C-794/18 P: Appeal brought on 17 December 2018 by Pracsis SPRL, Conceptexpo Project against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 3 October 2018 in Case T-33/18, Pracsis and Conceptexpo Project v Commission and EACEA
OJ C 182, 27.5.2019, p. 3–3
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.5.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 182/3 |
Appeal brought on 17 December 2018 by Pracsis SPRL, Conceptexpo Project against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 3 October 2018 in Case T-33/18, Pracsis and Conceptexpo Project v Commission and EACEA
(Case C-794/18 P)
(2019/C 182/04)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellants: Pracsis SPRL, Conceptexpo Project (represented by: J.-N. Louis, avocat)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA)
By order of 11 April 2019, the Court (Seventh Chamber) dismissed the appeal as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.