Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017CA0670

    Case C-670/17 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 February 2019 — Hellenic Republic v European Commission (Appeal — European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) — Guidance Section — Reduction of financial assistance — Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 — Operational programme — Financial corrections — Article 39 — Legal basis — Transitional provisions)

    OJ C 139, 15.4.2019, p. 17–17 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    15.4.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 139/17


    Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 February 2019 — Hellenic Republic v European Commission

    (Case C-670/17 P) (1)

    (Appeal - European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) - Guidance Section - Reduction of financial assistance - Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 - Operational programme - Financial corrections - Article 39 - Legal basis - Transitional provisions)

    (2019/C 139/15)

    Language of the case: Greek

    Parties

    Appellant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: G. Kanellopoulos, A. Vasilopoulou and I. Pachi, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and J. Aquilina, acting as Agents)

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 19 September 2017, Greece v Commission (T-327/15, not published, EU:T:2017:631);

    2.

    Annuls Commission Implementing Decision C(2015) 1936 final of 25 March 2015 on applying financial correction on the EAGGF Guidance Section of the operational programme CCI No 2000GR061PO021 (Greece — Objective 1 — Rural Reconstruction);

    3.

    Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Hellenic Republic both in the proceedings at first instance and on appeal.


    (1)  OJ C 42, 5.2.2018.


    Top