This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TA0608
Case T-608/16: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — PA v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Staff report — 2014 appraisal period — Promotion — 2015 appraisal period — Obligation to state reasons — Misuse of power — Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
Case T-608/16: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — PA v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Staff report — 2014 appraisal period — Promotion — 2015 appraisal period — Obligation to state reasons — Misuse of power — Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
Case T-608/16: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — PA v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Staff report — 2014 appraisal period — Promotion — 2015 appraisal period — Obligation to state reasons — Misuse of power — Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
OJ C 328, 17.9.2018, p. 42–42
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
17.9.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 328/42 |
Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — PA v Parliament
(Case T-608/16) (1)
((Civil service - Officials - Staff report - 2014 appraisal period - Promotion - 2015 appraisal period - Obligation to state reasons - Misuse of power - Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights))
(2018/C 328/57)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: PA (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Deneys and V. Montebello-Demogeot, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking annulment, first, of the applicant’s staff report for 2014, as finalised by the decision of the Secretary-General of the Parliament of 20 October 2015, second, of the decision of the Secretary-General of the Parliament of 9 December 2015 awarding him one merit point for 2014, third, of the Parliament’s decision, communicated to the staff of that institution on 30 November 2015, not to promote the applicant to Grade AST 11 in the 2015 promotion exercise and, in so far as necessary, annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 9 June 2016 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 21 January 2016.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders PA to pay the costs. |
(1) OJ C 364 of 3.10.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal as Case No F-38/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).