Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018CN0447

    Case C-447/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 9 July 2018 — UB v Generálny riaditeľ Sociálnej poisťovne Bratislava

    OJ C 328, 17.9.2018, p. 28–28 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    17.9.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 328/28


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 9 July 2018 — UB v Generálny riaditeľ Sociálnej poisťovne Bratislava

    (Case C-447/18)

    (2018/C 328/37)

    Language of the case: Slovak

    Referring court

    Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: UB

    Respondent: Generálny riaditeľ Sociálnej poisťovne Bratislava

    Question referred

    In the circumstances of the main proceedings, is it possible to interpret Article 1(w), Article 4 and Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, considered in conjunction with the right to social security benefits and social advantages, as enshrined in Article 34(1) and (2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as precluding the application of a provision of national legislation pursuant to which the Slovak social security body is to take into consideration an applicant’s citizenship as a fundamental condition for the purposes of determining the right of national sports representatives to a benefit in addition to the old-age pension, even if another statutory requirement, namely the fact of having represented the legal predecessors of the State, including the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic, is also part of that provision of national legislation?


    (1)  OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1.


    Top