This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TN0202
Case T-202/18: Action brought on 23 March 2018 — Bruel v Commission
Case T-202/18: Action brought on 23 March 2018 — Bruel v Commission
Case T-202/18: Action brought on 23 March 2018 — Bruel v Commission
OJ C 166, 14.5.2018, p. 45–46
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
14.5.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 166/45 |
Action brought on 23 March 2018 — Bruel v Commission
(Case T-202/18)
(2018/C 166/57)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Damien Bruel (Paris, France) (represented by: H. Hansen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
declare the present application admissible and well founded; |
and consequently:
— |
annul the decision of 18 January 2018 entitled ‘Decision of the Secretary General pursuant to Article 4 of the rules implementing Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001’ on the ground of infringement of Articles 4, 6 and 9 of that regulation, and infringement of Article 47 of the Charter, of Article 6 the European Convention on Human Rights, of the general principle of equality of arms, and of the duty to state reasons; |
in any event:
— |
order the defendant to pay all the costs; |
— |
reserve to the applicant all other rights, entitlements, pleas and actions. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of his application, the applicant puts forward four pleas in law:
1. |
A first plea, alleging that Articles 4 and 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43) have been infringed. |
2. |
A second plea, alleging that Article 6 of Regulation No 1049/2001 has been infringed. |
3. |
A third plea, alleging that the general principle of equality of arms, Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights have been infringed. |
4. |
A fourth plea, alleging that Article 4(6) of Regulation No 1049/2001, the principle of proportionality and the duty to state reasons have been infringed. |