This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TB0602
Case T-602/15: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2016 — Jenkinson v Council and Others (Arbitration clause — EU international mission personnel — Consecutive fixed-term employment contracts — Claim for compensation — Manifest lack of jurisdiction — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-602/15: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2016 — Jenkinson v Council and Others (Arbitration clause — EU international mission personnel — Consecutive fixed-term employment contracts — Claim for compensation — Manifest lack of jurisdiction — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-602/15: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2016 — Jenkinson v Council and Others (Arbitration clause — EU international mission personnel — Consecutive fixed-term employment contracts — Claim for compensation — Manifest lack of jurisdiction — Manifest inadmissibility)
Information about publishing Official Journal not found, p. 34–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
16.1.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 14/34 |
Order of the General Court of 9 November 2016 — Jenkinson v Council and Others
(Case T-602/15) (1)
((Arbitration clause - EU international mission personnel - Consecutive fixed-term employment contracts - Claim for compensation - Manifest lack of jurisdiction - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2017/C 014/41)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Liam Jenkinson (Killarney, Ireland) (represented by: N. de Montigny and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)
Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro and M. Bishop, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and S. Bartelt, acting as Agents), European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt, E. Chaboureau and G. Pasqualetti, acting as Agents), Eulex Kosovo (represented by: D. Fouquet and E. Raoult, lawyers)
Subject matter of the proceedings
Principally, an application pursuant to Article 272 TFEU seeking, on the one hand, to have the applicant’s contractual relationship reclassified as an employment contract of indeterminate duration and to obtain compensation for the loss that the applicant claims to have suffered as a result of the abusive use of consecutive fixed-term contracts and an unfair dismissal, and, on the other hand, a declaration that the Council, the Commission and EEAS discriminated against the applicant and an order requiring them to pay compensation to the applicant, and, in the alternative, a claim based on the non-contractual liability of the European institutions.
Operative part of the order
|
1) |
The action is dismissed. |
|
2) |
Liam Jenkinson is ordered to pay the costs. |