EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0043
Case T-43/15: Action brought on 28 January 2015 — CRM v Commission
Case T-43/15: Action brought on 28 January 2015 — CRM v Commission
Case T-43/15: Action brought on 28 January 2015 — CRM v Commission
OJ C 89, 16.3.2015, p. 43–44
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
16.3.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 89/43 |
Action brought on 28 January 2015 — CRM v Commission
(Case T-43/15)
(2015/C 089/52)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: CRM Srl (Modena, Italy) (represented by: G. Forte, C. Marinuzzi and A. Franchi, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1174/2014 of 24 October 2014 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Piadina Romagnola/Piada Romagnola (PGI)), published in the Official Journal of the European Union of 4 November 2014 (Volume L 316); |
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The present action is brought against the registration of the protected geographical indication ‘Piadina Romagnola/Piada Romagnola’ with regard to the fact that the reputation enjoyed by handcrafted Piadina has been extended to cover Piadina produced on an industrial scale.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging infringement and incorrect application of Article 7(1)(f)(ii) and Article 8(1)(c)(ii) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ 2012 L 343, p. 1).
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment and a failure to conduct a proper preliminary investigation.
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Articles 6 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights and of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, on the ground of breach of the right to effective judicial protection. |