This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TB0418
Case T-418/13: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2015 — Richter + Frenzel v OHIM — Ferdinand Richter (Richter + Frenzel) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-418/13: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2015 — Richter + Frenzel v OHIM — Ferdinand Richter (Richter + Frenzel) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-418/13: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2015 — Richter + Frenzel v OHIM — Ferdinand Richter (Richter + Frenzel) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 89, 16.3.2015, p. 25–26
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
16.3.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 89/25 |
Order of the General Court of 21 January 2015 — Richter + Frenzel v OHIM — Ferdinand Richter (Richter + Frenzel)
(Case T-418/13) (1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 089/30)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Richter + Frenzel GmbH (Würzburg, Germany) (represented by: D. Altenburg, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: A. Pohlmann, and subsequently by: D. Botis, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Ferdinand Richter GmbH (Pasching, Austria) (represented by: M. Grötschl, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 March 2013 (Case R 2001/2011-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Ferdinand Richter GmbH and Richter + Frenzel GmbH + Co. KG.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2. |
The applicant and intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs of the defendant. |