This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TA0123
Case T-123/14: Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2015 — BSH v OHIM (AquaPerfect) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark AquaPerfect — Earlier Community word mark waterPerfect — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-123/14: Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2015 — BSH v OHIM (AquaPerfect) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark AquaPerfect — Earlier Community word mark waterPerfect — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-123/14: Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2015 — BSH v OHIM (AquaPerfect) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark AquaPerfect — Earlier Community word mark waterPerfect — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 89, 16.3.2015, p. 24–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
16.3.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 89/24 |
Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2015 — BSH v OHIM (AquaPerfect)
(Case T-123/14) (1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark AquaPerfect - Earlier Community word mark waterPerfect - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 089/28)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: S. Biagosch, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Arçelik A.Ş. (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: A. Franke, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 December 2013 (Case R 314/2013-4) concerning opposition proceedings between BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH and Arçelik A.Ş.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 9 December 2013 (Case R 314/2013-4) concerning opposition proceedings between BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH and Arçelik A.Ş.; |
|
2. |
Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte; |
|
3. |
Orders Arçelik to bear its own costs. |