Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TN0605

Case T-605/14: Action brought on 11 August 2014  — Drex Technologies v Council

OJ C 361, 13.10.2014, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

13.10.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/22


Action brought on 11 August 2014 — Drex Technologies v Council

(Case T-605/14)

2014/C 361/33

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Drex Technologies SA (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: E. Ruchat and C. Cornet d’Elzius, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

declare its action to be both admissible and well founded;

consequently, annul Decision 2014/309/CFSP of 28 May 2014 and the subsequent measures implementing it in so far as they concern the applicant;

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those raised in Case T-432/11 Makhlouf v Council  (1).


(1)  OJ C 290, p. 13.


Top