EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012FA0081
Case F-81/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 10 April 2014 — Nieminen v Council (Civil service — Promotion — 2010 promotion procedure — 2011 promotion procedure — Decision not to promote the applicant — Duty to state reasons — Examination of comparative merits — Administrators assigned to linguistic functions and administrators assigned to functions other than linguistic functions — Promotion quotas — Consistency in the duration of the merits)
Case F-81/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 10 April 2014 — Nieminen v Council (Civil service — Promotion — 2010 promotion procedure — 2011 promotion procedure — Decision not to promote the applicant — Duty to state reasons — Examination of comparative merits — Administrators assigned to linguistic functions and administrators assigned to functions other than linguistic functions — Promotion quotas — Consistency in the duration of the merits)
Case F-81/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 10 April 2014 — Nieminen v Council (Civil service — Promotion — 2010 promotion procedure — 2011 promotion procedure — Decision not to promote the applicant — Duty to state reasons — Examination of comparative merits — Administrators assigned to linguistic functions and administrators assigned to functions other than linguistic functions — Promotion quotas — Consistency in the duration of the merits)
OJ C 159, 26.5.2014, p. 38–38
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.5.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 159/38 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 10 April 2014 — Nieminen v Council
(Case F-81/12) (1)
((Civil service - Promotion - 2010 promotion procedure - 2011 promotion procedure - Decision not to promote the applicant - Duty to state reasons - Examination of comparative merits - Administrators assigned to linguistic functions and administrators assigned to functions other than linguistic functions - Promotion quotas - Consistency in the duration of the merits))
2014/C 159/51
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Risto Nieminen (Kraainem, Belgium) (represented by: C. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers, initially, then C. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Herrmann and M. Bauer, Agents)
Re:
Application to annul the decisions not to promote the applicant to Grade AD 12 in respect of the 2010 and 2011 promotion procedures.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Mr Nieminen to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
(1) OJ C 295, 29.09.2012, p. 34.