EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TB0192
Case T-192/12: Order of the General Court of 12 March 2014 — PAN Europe v Commission (Action for annulment — Environment — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1143/2011 approving the active substance prochloraz — Request for internal review — Refusal — Conditions to be satisfied by an organisation in order to be entitled to make a request for internal review — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-192/12: Order of the General Court of 12 March 2014 — PAN Europe v Commission (Action for annulment — Environment — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1143/2011 approving the active substance prochloraz — Request for internal review — Refusal — Conditions to be satisfied by an organisation in order to be entitled to make a request for internal review — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-192/12: Order of the General Court of 12 March 2014 — PAN Europe v Commission (Action for annulment — Environment — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1143/2011 approving the active substance prochloraz — Request for internal review — Refusal — Conditions to be satisfied by an organisation in order to be entitled to make a request for internal review — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
OJ C 159, 26.5.2014, p. 25–25
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.5.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 159/25 |
Order of the General Court of 12 March 2014 — PAN Europe v Commission
(Case T-192/12) (1)
((Action for annulment - Environment - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1143/2011 approving the active substance prochloraz - Request for internal review - Refusal - Conditions to be satisfied by an organisation in order to be entitled to make a request for internal review - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
2014/C 159/34
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J. Rutteman, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, P. Oliver and P. Ondrůšek, and, subsequently, P. Ondrůšek, J. Tomkin and L. Pignataro-Nolin, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the Commission’s Decision of 9 March 2012 rejecting as inadmissible the request made by the applicant for review by the Commission of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1143/2011 of 10 November 2011 approving the active substance prochloraz, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 and Commission Decision 2008/934/EC (OJ 2011 L 293, p. 26)
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |