EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007TB0011
Case T-11/07 RENV: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2014 — Frucona Košice v Commission (State aid — Spirit and spirit-based beverages — Cancellation of a tax debt in a collective bankruptcy procedure — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings — Decision repealing and replacing the contested decision — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-11/07 RENV: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2014 — Frucona Košice v Commission (State aid — Spirit and spirit-based beverages — Cancellation of a tax debt in a collective bankruptcy procedure — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings — Decision repealing and replacing the contested decision — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-11/07 RENV: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2014 — Frucona Košice v Commission (State aid — Spirit and spirit-based beverages — Cancellation of a tax debt in a collective bankruptcy procedure — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings — Decision repealing and replacing the contested decision — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 159, 26.5.2014, p. 24–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.5.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 159/24 |
Order of the General Court of 21 March 2014 — Frucona Košice v Commission
(Case T-11/07 RENV) (1)
((State aid - Spirit and spirit-based beverages - Cancellation of a tax debt in a collective bankruptcy procedure - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings - Decision repealing and replacing the contested decision - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 159/32
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Frucona Košice a.s. (Košice, Slovakia) (represented by: K. Lasok QC, J. Holmes and B. Hartnett, Barristers, and O. Geiss, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati and K. Walkerová, Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: St. Nicolaus — trade a.s. (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented by: N. Smaho, lawyer)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2007/254/EC of 7 June 2006 on State aid C 25/05 (ex NN 21/05) implemented by the Slovak Republic for Fruncona Košice a.s. (OJ 2007 L 112, p. 14)
Operative part of the order
|
1) |
There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2) |
The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Frucona Košice a.s. |
|
3) |
St. Nicolaus — trade a.s. shall bear its own costs. |