Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012TA0339

    Case T-339/12: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2014 — Gandia Blasco v OHIM — Sachi Premium-Outdoor Furniture (Cuboid Armchair) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a cuboid armchair — Earlier design — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

    OJ C 78, 15.3.2014, p. 9–9 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    15.3.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 78/9


    Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2014 — Gandia Blasco v OHIM — Sachi Premium-Outdoor Furniture (Cuboid Armchair)

    (Case T-339/12) (1)

    (Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a cuboid armchair - Earlier design - Ground for invalidity - Individual character - Different overall impression - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

    2014/C 78/18

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Gandia Blasco, SA (Valencia, Spain) (represented by: I. Sempere Massa, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Sachi Premium-Outdoor Furniture, Lda (Estarreja, Portugal) (represented by: M. Oehen Mendes and M. Paes, lawyers)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 May 2012 (Case R 970/2011-3) in relation to invalidity proceedings between Gandia Blasco, SA and Sachi Premium-Outdoor Furniture, Lda.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Gandia Blasco, SA to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 295, 29.9.2012.


    Top