This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011FB0102
Case F-102/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 May 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure — Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings — Handwritten signature on the fax different from that on the original application received by post — Action lodged out of time — Manifestly inadmissible)
Case F-102/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 May 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure — Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings — Handwritten signature on the fax different from that on the original application received by post — Action lodged out of time — Manifestly inadmissible)
Case F-102/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 May 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure — Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings — Handwritten signature on the fax different from that on the original application received by post — Action lodged out of time — Manifestly inadmissible)
Information about publishing Official Journal not found, p. 49–49
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Information about publishing Official Journal not found, p. 30–30
(HR)
|
31.8.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 252/49 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 May 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case F-102/11) (1)
(Civil service - Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure - Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings - Handwritten signature on the fax different from that on the original application received by post - Action lodged out of time - Manifestly inadmissible)
2013/C 252/87
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser, J. Banquero Cruz, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
Re:
Application for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision refusing to pay to the applicant annual travelling expenses from the place of his employment to his place of origin for the period 2005 to 2010.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
(1) OJ C 126, 28.4.2012, p. 27.