Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013CN0262

    Case C-262/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim (Germany) lodged on 14 May 2013 — Ekkehard Aleweld v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

    OJ C 215, 27.7.2013, p. 7–7 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    OJ C 215, 27.7.2013, p. 5–5 (HR)

    27.7.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 215/7


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim (Germany) lodged on 14 May 2013 — Ekkehard Aleweld v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

    (Case C-262/13)

    2013/C 215/09

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Ekkehard Aleweld

    Defendant: Condor Flugdienst GmbH

    Questions referred

    1.

    Is there also a right under Article 7 of Regulation No 261/20004 (1) to compensation where the departure of the booked flight is delayed by more than three hours, the passenger rebooks on another airline and the delay on arrival compared with the original flight is thereby appreciably reduced, whilst both the original flight and the replacement flight arrive at the original destination far more than three hours late?

    2.

    If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative: is it decisive in this regard that the period of five hours, specified in Article 6(1)(iii), for application of Article 8(1) of the regulation has or has not expired?

    3.

    Is it material whether the rebooking was made independently by the passenger or with the defendant’s help?


    (1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).


    Top