This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TA0247
Case T-247/11: Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2013 — FairWild Foundation v OHIM — Wild (FAIRWILD) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark FAIRWILD — Earlier Community word mark WILD — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-247/11: Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2013 — FairWild Foundation v OHIM — Wild (FAIRWILD) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark FAIRWILD — Earlier Community word mark WILD — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-247/11: Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2013 — FairWild Foundation v OHIM — Wild (FAIRWILD) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark FAIRWILD — Earlier Community word mark WILD — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 114, 20.4.2013, p. 33–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
20.4.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 114/33 |
Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2013 — FairWild Foundation v OHIM — Wild (FAIRWILD)
(Case T-247/11) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Community - Word mark FAIRWILD - Earlier Community word mark WILD - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2013/C 114/53
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: FairWild Foundation (Weinfelden, Switzerland) (represented by: P. Neuwald and S. Müller, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: K. Klüpfel, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Rudolf Wild GmbH & Co. KG (Eppelheim, Germany) (represented by: A. Franke, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 March 2011 (Case R 1014/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Rudolf Wild GmbH & Co. KG and FairWild Foundation
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders FairWild Foundation to pay the costs. |