This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012CB0037
Case C-37/12 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 February 2013 — Saupiquet SAS v European Commission (Appeal — Common customs tariff — Tariff quota — Sunday closure of customs offices — Infringement of the principle of equal treatment — Accountability)
Case C-37/12 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 February 2013 — Saupiquet SAS v European Commission (Appeal — Common customs tariff — Tariff quota — Sunday closure of customs offices — Infringement of the principle of equal treatment — Accountability)
Case C-37/12 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 February 2013 — Saupiquet SAS v European Commission (Appeal — Common customs tariff — Tariff quota — Sunday closure of customs offices — Infringement of the principle of equal treatment — Accountability)
OJ C 108, 13.4.2013, p. 8–8
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
13.4.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 108/8 |
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 February 2013 — Saupiquet SAS v European Commission
(Case C-37/12 P) (1)
(Appeal - Common customs tariff - Tariff quota - Sunday closure of customs offices - Infringement of the principle of equal treatment - Accountability)
2013/C 108/14
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Saupiquet SAS (represented by: R. Ledru, avocat)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann and L. Keppenne, Agents)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 November 2011 in Case T-131/10 Saupiquet v Commission by which the General Court dismissed an application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 10005 final of 16 December 2009, holding that refunding import duties on canned tuna fish originating in Thailand to the appellant is not justified — Closure of customs offices on Sundays in certain Member States — Infringement of the principle of equal treatment — Incorrect interpretation
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Saupiquet SAS is ordered to pay the costs. |