Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011CB0597

    Case C-597/11 P: Order of the Court of 4 October 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (Appeal — Public contract awarded by the Commission — Rejection of a tender — Obligation to state reasons — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 — Article 89 — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 — Articles 140 and 141 — Period allowed for the receipt of tenders — Period allowed for the submission of requests for information)

    OJ C 101, 6.4.2013, p. 3–4 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    6.4.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 101/3


    Order of the Court of 4 October 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission

    (Case C-597/11 P) (1)

    (Appeal - Public contract awarded by the Commission - Rejection of a tender - Obligation to state reasons - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 - Article 89 - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 - Articles 140 and 141 - Period allowed for the receipt of tenders - Period allowed for the submission of requests for information)

    2013/C 101/06

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Appellant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, Δικηγόρος)

    Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Wilderspin, Agent)

    Re:

    Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2011 in Case T-232/06 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission dismissing an application for annulment of the Commission Decision of 19 June 2006 rejecting the tender submitted by the present appellant in response to call for tenders TAXUD/2005/AO-001 concerning the specification, development, maintenance and support of customs IT systems for DG TAXUD (OJ 2005, S 117-115222), and the decision to award the contract to another tenderer

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    The appeal is dismissed.

    2.

    Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE shall pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.


    Top