This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TA0412
Case T-412/11: Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2013 — Maharishi Foundation v OHIM (TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION — Absolute grounds for refusal — Decision of the Board of Appeal remitting the case to the Examination Division — Article 65(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Admissibility — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Relevant public)
Case T-412/11: Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2013 — Maharishi Foundation v OHIM (TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION — Absolute grounds for refusal — Decision of the Board of Appeal remitting the case to the Examination Division — Article 65(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Admissibility — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Relevant public)
Case T-412/11: Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2013 — Maharishi Foundation v OHIM (TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION — Absolute grounds for refusal — Decision of the Board of Appeal remitting the case to the Examination Division — Article 65(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Admissibility — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Relevant public)
OJ C 79, 16.3.2013, p. 16–16
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
16.3.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 79/16 |
Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2013 — Maharishi Foundation v OHIM (TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION)
(Case T-412/11) (1)
(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION - Absolute grounds for refusal - Decision of the Board of Appeal remitting the case to the Examination Division - Article 65(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Admissibility - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Relevant public)
2013/C 79/29
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Maharishi Foundation Ltd (Saint-Hélier, Jersey) (represented by: A. Meijboom, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 March 2011 (Case R 1293/2010-2), concerning an application for registration of the word sign TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION as a Community trade mark
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Maharishi Foundation Ltd to pay the costs. |