This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TB0403
Case T-403/12 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 14 November 2012 — Intrasoft v Commission (Interim measures — Public contracts — Procurement procedure — Rejection of a bid — Application for a stay of execution — Lack of urgency)
Case T-403/12 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 14 November 2012 — Intrasoft v Commission (Interim measures — Public contracts — Procurement procedure — Rejection of a bid — Application for a stay of execution — Lack of urgency)
Case T-403/12 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 14 November 2012 — Intrasoft v Commission (Interim measures — Public contracts — Procurement procedure — Rejection of a bid — Application for a stay of execution — Lack of urgency)
OJ C 9, 12.1.2013, p. 38–38
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.1.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 9/38 |
Order of the President of the General Court of 14 November 2012 — Intrasoft v Commission
(Case T-403/12 R)
(Interim measures - Public contracts - Procurement procedure - Rejection of a bid - Application for a stay of execution - Lack of urgency)
2013/C 9/69
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Intrasoft International SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and E. Georgieva, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for a stay of execution, first, of the decision of the Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia of 10 August 2012 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in the tendering procedure EuropeAid/131367/C/SER/RS concerning technical assistance to the customs administration of Serbia to support the modernisation of the customs system (OJ 2011/S 160-262712), and, secondly, of the decision of the Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia of 12 September 2012 informing the applicant that the evaluation committee had recommended that the contract be awarded to another tenderer.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The application for interim measures is rejected. |
|
2. |
The costs are reserved. |