This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012CN0482
Case C-482/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov (Slovakia) lodged on 29 October 2012 — Peter Macinský, Eva Macinská v Getfin s.r.o., Financreal s.r.o.
Case C-482/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov (Slovakia) lodged on 29 October 2012 — Peter Macinský, Eva Macinská v Getfin s.r.o., Financreal s.r.o.
Case C-482/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov (Slovakia) lodged on 29 October 2012 — Peter Macinský, Eva Macinská v Getfin s.r.o., Financreal s.r.o.
OJ C 9, 12.1.2013, p. 32–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.1.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 9/32 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov (Slovakia) lodged on 29 October 2012 — Peter Macinský, Eva Macinská v Getfin s.r.o., Financreal s.r.o.
(Case C-482/12)
2013/C 9/54
Language of the case: Slovak
Referring court
Okresný súd Prešov
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Peter Macinský, Eva Macinská
Defendants: Getfin s.r.o., Financreal s.r.o.
Question referred
|
1. |
Is Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (‘Directive 93/13/EEC’) to be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State, such as Paragraph 151j(1) of the Občianský zákonník (Civil Code) in conjunction with the other provisions of legislation at issue in the present case, which enables a creditor to enforce the fulfilment of unfair contract terms by enforcing a lien by the sale of immovable property despite the objections of the consumer and a dispute regarding the matter and without an assessment of the contract terms by a court or other independent tribunal ? |