Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012CN0493

    Case C-493/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 5 November 2012 — Eli Lilly and Company Ltd v Human Genome Sciences Inc

    OJ C 9, 12.1.2013, p. 33–33 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    12.1.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 9/33


    Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 5 November 2012 — Eli Lilly and Company Ltd v Human Genome Sciences Inc

    (Case C-493/12)

    2013/C 9/55

    Language of the case: English

    Referring court

    High Court of Justice (Chancery Division)

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Eli Lilly and Company Ltd

    Defendant: Human Genome Sciences Inc

    Questions referred

    (a)

    What are the criteria for deciding whether ‘the product is protected by a basic patent in force’ in Article 3(a) of Regulation 469/2009/EC (1) (the ‘Regulation’)?

    (b)

    Are the criteria different where the product is not a combination product, and if so, what are the criteria?

    (c)

    In the case of a claim to an antibody or a class of antibodies, is it sufficient that the antibody or antibodies are defined in terms of their binding characteristics to a target protein, or is it necessary to provide a structural definition for the antibody or antibodies, and if so, how much?


    (1)  Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (Codified version) (Text with EEA relevance)

    OJ L 152, p. 1


    Top