Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010TA0557

Case T-557/10: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2012 — H.Eich v OHIM — Arav (H.EICH) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark H.EICH — Earlier national figurative mark H SILVIAN HEACH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

OJ C 227, 28.7.2012, p. 19–19 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

28.7.2012   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/19


Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2012 — H.Eich v OHIM — Arav (H.EICH)

(Case T-557/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark H.EICH - Earlier national figurative mark H SILVIAN HEACH - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 227/29

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: H.Eich Srl (Signa, Italy) (represented by: D. Mainini, T. Rubin, A. Masetti Zannini de Concina, M. Bucarelli, G. Petrocchi and B. Passaretti, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Mannucci and R. Pethke, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Arav Holding Srl (Palma Campania, Italy) (represented by: R. Bocchini, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 September 2010 (Case R 1411/2009-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Arav Holding Srl and H.Eich Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 9 September 2010 (Case R 1411/2009-1);

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by H.Eich Srl in the proceedings before the General Court;

3.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs necessarily incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the First Board of Appeal;

4.

Orders Arav Holding Srl to bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.


Top