Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012FN0041

    Case F-41/12: Action brought on 21 March 2012 — ZZ v Parliament

    OJ C 138, 12.5.2012, p. 38–39 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    12.5.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 138/38


    Action brought on 21 March 2012 — ZZ v Parliament

    (Case F-41/12)

    (2012/C 138/90)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: ZZ (represented by: R. Adam and P. Ketter, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Parliament

    Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

    Application for (i) annulment of the European Parliament’s decision terminating the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff appointed for an indefinite period and (ii) for compensation.

    Form of order sought

    Annul the decision of the Parliament of 20 June 2011 terminating the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff appointed for an indefinite period;

    so far as is necessary, annul the express decision of the European Parliament rejecting the complaint;

    reinstate the applicant at the European Parliament;

    in the alternative and if, contrary to all probability, the Tribunal should conclude that that no reinstatement was possible, such reinstatement being in the interests of neither the applicant nor the European Parliament, order the European Parliament to pay 36 months’ salary by way of compensation for material damage, or alternatively any other amount to be assessed ex aequo et bono, in addition to EUR 15 000 by way of compensation for non-material damage;

    in any event, order the Parliament to pay EUR 15 000 by way of compensation for non-material damage;

    reserve to the applicant all other rights, remedies, pleas and actions, in particular with regard to (i) claiming additional damages for the harm suffered by reason of the Parliament’s wrongful conduct, (ii) producing additional evidence and (iii) calling the relevant witnesses;

    order the Parliament to pay all the costs of the proceedings, including the lawyers’ fees incurred by the applicant.


    Top