This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TA0313
Case T-313/10: Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2011 — Three-N-Products Private v OHIM — Shah (AYUURI NATURAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark AYUURI NATURAL — Earlier Community word and figurative marks AYUR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-313/10: Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2011 — Three-N-Products Private v OHIM — Shah (AYUURI NATURAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark AYUURI NATURAL — Earlier Community word and figurative marks AYUR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-313/10: Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2011 — Three-N-Products Private v OHIM — Shah (AYUURI NATURAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark AYUURI NATURAL — Earlier Community word and figurative marks AYUR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 370, 17.12.2011, p. 24–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
17.12.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 370/24 |
Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2011 — Three-N-Products Private v OHIM — Shah (AYUURI NATURAL)
(Case T-313/10) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark AYUURI NATURAL - Earlier Community word and figurative marks AYUR - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2011/C 370/40
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Three-N-Products Private Ltd (New Delhi, India) (represented by: C. Jäger, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Sheilesh Shah (Wembley, United Kingdom); and Akhil Shah (Wembley) (represented by: M. Chapple, Barrister)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 June 2010 (case R 1005/2009-4), relating to opposition proceedings between (i) Three-N-Products Private Ltd and (ii) S. Shah, A. Shah and Mr M. Shah.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for the Harmonisation of the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 June 2010 (case R 1005/2009-4); |
|
2. |
Orders OHIM to pay its own costs and those of Three-N-Products Private Ltd; |
|
3. |
Orders Sheleish Shah and Akhil Shah to bear their own costs and the costs necessarily incurred by Three-N-Products Private Ltd for the purposes of the proceedings before the Fourth Board of Appeal. |