Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008TA0522

Case T-522/08: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2011 — Ruiz de la Prada de Sentmenat v OHIM — Quant (AGATHA RUIZ DE LA PRADA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark AGATHA RUIZ DE LA PRADA — Earlier Community figurative mark representing a black and white flower — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

OJ C 311, 22.10.2011, p. 37–37 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

22.10.2011   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/37


Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2011 — Ruiz de la Prada de Sentmenat v OHIM — Quant (AGATHA RUIZ DE LA PRADA)

(Case T-522/08) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark AGATHA RUIZ DE LA PRADA - Earlier Community figurative mark representing a black and white flower - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2011/C 311/66

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Agatha Ruiz de la Prada de Sentmenat (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: R. Bercovitz Álvarez, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Mary Quant Ltd (Birmingham, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Arnold and C. Hicks, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 September 2008 (Case R 1523/2007-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Mary Quant Ltd and Agatha Ruiz de la Prada de Sentmenat.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Agatha Ruiz de la Prada de Sentmenat to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 32, 7.2.2009.


Top