EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TB0175
Case T-175/10: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Milux v OHIM (FERTILITYINVIVO) (Community trade mark — Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party — Inadmissibility)
Case T-175/10: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Milux v OHIM (FERTILITYINVIVO) (Community trade mark — Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party — Inadmissibility)
Case T-175/10: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Milux v OHIM (FERTILITYINVIVO) (Community trade mark — Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party — Inadmissibility)
OJ C 145, 14.5.2011, p. 28–28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
14.5.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 145/28 |
Order of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Milux v OHIM (FERTILITYINVIVO)
(Case T-175/10) (1)
(Community trade mark - Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party - Inadmissibility)
2011/C 145/47
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Milux Holding SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Bojs, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 February 2010 (Case R 1116/2009-4), concerning the application for registration of the word sign FERTILITYINVIVO as a Community trade mark
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Milux Holding SA is ordered to pay the costs. |