Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62010CB0003

    Case C-3/10: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Rossano (Italy)) — Franco Affatato v Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Cosenza (Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Clause 5 of the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work — Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector — Successive contracts — Abuse — Preventive measures — Sanctions — Conversion of fixed-term contracts to a contract of unlimited duration — Prohibition — Compensation for damage — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness)

    OJ C 30, 29.1.2011, p. 11–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    29.1.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 30/11

    Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Rossano (Italy)) — Franco Affatato v Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Cosenza

    (Case C-3/10) (1)

    (Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Social policy - Directive 1999/70/EC - Clause 5 of the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work - Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector - Successive contracts - Abuse - Preventive measures - Sanctions - Conversion of fixed-term contracts to a contract of unlimited duration - Prohibition - Compensation for damage - Principles of equivalence and effectiveness)

    2011/C 30/17

    Language of the case: Italian

    Referring court

    Tribunale di Rossano (Italy)

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Franco Affatato

    Defendant: Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Cosenza

    Re:

    Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale di Rossano — Interpretation of Clauses 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the Annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43) — Compatibility of certain provisions of national law on socially useful workers/publicly useful workers — National legislation that allows not indicating the reason for the first a fixed-term contract for workers in the education sector — Concept of a state body — Inclusion of a person with the characteristics of Poste Italiane SpA

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    The first 12 questions referred by the Tribunale di Rossano (Italy), by decision of 21 December 2009, are manifestly inadmissible.

    2.

    Clause 5 of the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work, concluded on 18 March 1999, which is annexed to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, must be interpreted as meaning that:

    —

    it does not preclude national legislation, such as that in Article 36(5) of Legislative Decree No 165 of 30 March 2001 laying down general rules concerning the organisation of employment in public administrations, which prohibits, in the event of abuse resulting from the use of successive fixed-term employment contracts by a public sector employer, the conversion of those contracts to a contract of unlimited duration, where the internal legal order of the Member State concerned contains, in the sector under consideration, other effective measures to avoid and, as necessary, penalise the abusive use of successive fixed-term contracts. Nevertheless, it is for the national court to assess to what extent the conditions for application and the effective implementation of the relevant provisions of domestic law constitute an adequate measure for the prevention and, as necessary, penalisation of the abusive use by the public administration of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships;

    —

    it is, as such, in no way liable to affect the fundamental political and constitutional structures or the essential functions of the Member State concerned within the meaning of Article 4(2) TEU.

    3.

    That framework agreement must be interpreted as meaning that measures provides for by national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in order to penalise the abusive use of fixed-term employment contracts or relationships must not be less favourable than those governing similar internal situations or make it practically impossible or excessively difficult to exercise the rights conferred by the legal order of the European Union. It is for the national court to assess to what extent the provisions of domestic law intended to penalise the abusive use by the public administration of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships comply with those principles.

    (1)  OJ C 63, 13.3.2010.

    Top