9.10.2008   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/76

—

calls on the European Commission to draw up a framework programme to facilitate cooperation and networking between all the administrations involved, and to draft guidelines for setting up and interlinking clusters — including across borders. Cooperation between clusters is a promising way to strengthen Europe's innovative capacity and attract global attention from investors and innovators, which is why cross-border cooperation between cluster organisations should not be restricted to Europe alone, but should be global, with a view to achieving an end goal of ‘world level clusters’;

—

considers that there should be a general strategic framework bringing together the approaches of the various stakeholders: public administrations, universities, research centres and businesses, so as to implement the three abovementioned processes in a coordinated manner:

—

in this context, proposes that the first step in developing the strategic framework should be to set up a High Level Expert Group which would study the matter and set down guidelines for the integration and harmonisation of criteria for the Council and the Commission.

Rapporteur

:

Antonio GONZÁLEZ TEROL (ES/EPP), Director-General for European affairs, Autonomous Community of Madrid

1.

calls on the forthcoming French presidency to continue encouraging reports, studies and political debates on clusters, and to explore new initiatives that could be developed as part of the strategy on cluster policy being drawn up by the Commission;

2.

understands the term ‘cluster’ to mean a geographical concentration of companies specialised in one sector, which are linked with specific suppliers and other enterprises in interrelated industries, and which compete but also cooperate with one another. This sector encompasses a large number of industries, a cross-fertilisation of disciplines and activities. Clusters are fully developed once they are able to harness their interdependence to bid for complementary business, generating synergies which bring growth to the whole sector, from which all the cluster members benefit. The term ‘coopetition’ is used to define the business strategy particular to clusters which straddles competition and cooperation, maximising competitiveness. There must be mutual trust between the cluster members, and they must share certain objectives and priorities so as to achieve full coordination in a multi-level context;

3.

acknowledges the EU's weakness in turning ideas into new products and services, and recognises that new public policies must be adopted in order to facilitate networking between the different social players involved in creating, transmitting and applying knowledge. In concrete terms, new linkages must be developed between public administrations, universities, research centres and businesses;

4.

considers that investment in R+D, is necessary but has so far not been sufficient. To encourage innovation in Europe, it is important to join forces and gear investment in research specifically towards strategic areas;

5.

highlights that simply concentrating businesses geographically does not guarantee that clusters — or network economies, synergies or improved competitiveness — will ensue. A critical mass or sufficient production quantity must be reached, below which clusters cannot be said to exist. Qualitative aspects and external conditions must also be taken into consideration, particularly mutual trust and a sound relationship between businesses, so that joint action can be successfully taken on a sustainable footing;

6.

considers that there is not enough statistical data to measure these two aspects, and suggests that the European Cluster Observatory conduct a study on the conditions needed for these aspects, which determine the existence of a cluster, to be taken into account; offers its support, on the basis of its experience and proximity to the regions;

7.

agrees that clusters are important innovation drivers, contribute to the competitiveness and sustainable development of industry and services, and boost the economic development of regions by creating wealth and jobs, thus contributing to territorial cohesion, one of the EU's stated objectives in the Lisbon Treaty;

8.

considers that, in many cases, public authorities and private bodies should be involved in encouraging the setting up of clusters and helping to keep them on the cutting edge of their sectors;

9.

The public sector can also play a significant role in addressing the challenges faced by cluster initiatives by:

10.

also believes that it should be the role of the public sector to create an environment in which clusters can flourish, for instance by:

Nonetheless, highlights that the public authorities must avoid making two important mistakes:

11.

considers that, in order to compete on the global market, clusters need to build a strong network linking businesses, universities and public authorities, and a constant innovation process that enables them to continue generating new synergies. This is the only way to ensure the future viability of clusters. It should be borne in mind that, although excellence is a feature of clusters, not all clusters can achieve the same level of development or international scope. Excellence in this context is created gradually, over time, via specific financial resources, good governance and structural, market-oriented reforms, allowing for the necessary factor mobility (venture capital and researchers);

12.

considers that, faced with the current globalisation of markets, it is essential to create ‘global value chains’ (GVC) through clusters in order to improve coordination between enterprises and overall competitiveness. While innovation is a basic feature of all clusters, not all of them operate in high-tech sectors: some are medium- or low-tech;

13.

points out that clusters are particularly useful for SMEs, as they provide a context which encourages links with universities and large businesses, and enables them to access international trade networks;

14.

warns, however, that some countries and regions are too focused on SMEs, overlooking the fact that if not enough large companies are present, the economic impact of clusters can be limited;

15.

considers that, at present, the free movement of factors of production and the high costs in developed economies encourage relocation, which must be confronted by orienting production systems towards activities with greater added value, above all activities requiring intensive R+D and innovation;

16.

considers that the Lisbon Agenda was a response to the new challenges of globalisation, with the aims of enhancing human capital in the EU, giving more consistency to innovation policies, creating a legislative framework to encourage this, promoting the creation and growth of innovative enterprises and improving interfaces within the innovation system. Achieving these aims will help us to move towards a society open to innovation and knowledge and, therefore, competitive — if not in terms of costs then in terms of added value;

17.

stresses that, for regions to be more competitive, it is important to boost those sectors which are capital-intensive, clearly innovative, with highly specialised human resources;

18.

points out that there is a shortage of private spending on R+D in Europe; but, considers that there is no point simply increasing public R+D spending if enterprises themselves do not adopt these goals and drive the necessary initiatives. However, it is important for national public spending on R&D to be at a level high enough for it to be effective. This is the only way for such spending to be channelled, via research and innovation, to the market. Public R+D spending should leverage private R+D and innovation in order to substantially increase the percentage of GDP devoted to it by Europe's regions. To achieve this, there are four main areas for action:

19.

welcomes the developments promoted by the European Commission through a number of programmes and networks which have led to real progress in designing and establishing clusters, enabling experiences to be exchanged;

20.

does not question the European Commission's support for the development of new, improved clusters at national or regional level; considers, however, that there is a need for information on identifying and developing good practices, and for centres to pinpoint those tools which could be systematically used or consulted, and which should be made readily available to operators. Points out, that in this regard the Committee is currently launching a study on Clusters and clustering policy: a guide for regional and local policymakers;

21.

nonetheless, calls on the European Commission to draw up a framework programme to facilitate cooperation and networking between all the administrations involved, and to draft guidelines for setting up and interlinking clusters — including across borders. Cooperation between clusters is seen as a promising way to strengthen Europe's innovative capacity and attract global attention from investors and innovators, which is why cross-border cooperation between cluster organisations should not be restricted to Europe alone, but should be global, with a view to achieving an end goal of ‘world level clusters’;

22.

considers that cooperation between clusters is of vital interest for SMEs: importantly, it facilitates information, technical exchanges, and the possibility of sharing research infrastructure and production resources;

23.

notes that there is a discrepancy between many clusters' desire to develop their own business in their own regions or countries, and the huge opportunities offered by exchanging information and best practices with neighbouring clusters from other States;

24.

urges the Commission to remove all barriers to trade and investment within Europe. The completion of the internal market is a key means for opening up markets to competition;

25.

points out that barriers to trade, together with differing legislation, social protection, administrative and tax systems, can be a significant hindrance to cross-border cooperation. Lastly, language barriers also mean that clusters tend to manage and carry out their activities within the borders of their own countries, limiting their international links;

26.

recommends that the European Commission remedy the fragmented nature of the measures devoted to cluster promotion in the EU, and considers that these should be grouped under one specific line of action to promote clusters and support inter-cluster cooperation;

27.

as a necessary support for the ever-expanding tasks assigned by the Commission to regional authorities in the promotion, coordination and exploitation of cluster initiatives, the CoR considers that the Commission should also give the regions a clearer picture of the research and innovation initiatives which it administers directly (principally the 7th FP and the CIP). Similarly, special attention should also be paid to ensuring proper coordination with the autonomous agencies set up by the Commission in the research and innovation field and with the JTI (Joint Technology Initiatives).

28.

calls for the adoption and harmonisation of criteria to boost clusters at European level, which the CoR believes would be a key addition to existing cooperation policies at all levels, so as to create a single, structured approach rather than the partial approach taken by the various European cluster initiatives currently existing in a variety of areas (R+D, interregional cooperation policy, technology/competition tracking, project funding support, etc.);

29.

stresses that all the measures promoted through this integrated approach should focus on growth and competitiveness, and on priority areas of action which must go beyond simply exchanging experiences and information to include joint projects and initiatives, inter-project exchanges of staff and beneficiaries, development of Community networks and institutions, etc.;

To this end, proposes: