This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/170/51
Case T-164/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 May 2007 — Wauthier and Deveen v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Reports procedure — Career development review — 2001/2002 Appraisal exercise — Action manifestly inadmissible and manifestly devoid of any legal basis)
Case T-164/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 May 2007 — Wauthier and Deveen v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Reports procedure — Career development review — 2001/2002 Appraisal exercise — Action manifestly inadmissible and manifestly devoid of any legal basis)
Case T-164/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 May 2007 — Wauthier and Deveen v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Reports procedure — Career development review — 2001/2002 Appraisal exercise — Action manifestly inadmissible and manifestly devoid of any legal basis)
OJ C 170, 21.7.2007, p. 26–26
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
21.7.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 170/26 |
Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 May 2007 — Wauthier and Deveen v Commission
(Case T-164/04) (1)
(Staff cases - Officials - Reports procedure - Career development review - 2001/2002 Appraisal exercise - Action manifestly inadmissible and manifestly devoid of any legal basis)
(2007/C 170/51)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Patricia Wauthier (Tubize, Belgium) and Viviane Deveen (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers, and subsequently by F. Frabetti alone)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment, principally, of the 2001/2002 appraisal exercise in relation to the applicants; and, alternatively, of the applicants' career development reviews for that exercise.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as partly manifestly inadmissible and, for the rest, as manifestly devoid of any legal basis. |
|
2. |
The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs. |