This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/170/42
Case T-167/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 June 2007 — Grether v OHIM — Crisgo (FENNEL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the figurative Community trade mark FENNEL — Earlier Community word mark FENJAL — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b), Article 73, second sentence, and Article 74(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Case T-167/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 June 2007 — Grether v OHIM — Crisgo (FENNEL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the figurative Community trade mark FENNEL — Earlier Community word mark FENJAL — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b), Article 73, second sentence, and Article 74(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Case T-167/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 June 2007 — Grether v OHIM — Crisgo (FENNEL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the figurative Community trade mark FENNEL — Earlier Community word mark FENJAL — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b), Article 73, second sentence, and Article 74(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
OJ C 170, 21.7.2007, p. 22–22
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
21.7.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 170/22 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 June 2007 — Grether v OHIM — Crisgo (FENNEL)
(Case T-167/05) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the figurative Community trade mark FENNEL - Earlier Community word mark FENJAL - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b), Article 73, second sentence, and Article 74(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
(2007/C 170/42)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Grether AG (Binningen, Switzerland) (represented by: initially, V. von Bomhard, A. Pohlmann and A. Renck, and subsequently, V. von Bomhard, A. Pohlmann and T. Dolde, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Crisgo (Thailand) Co. Ltd (Samutsakom, Thailand) (represented by: A. Bensoussan, M. Haas and L. Tellier-Loniewski, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Chamber of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 October 2004 (Case R 250/2002-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Grether AG and Crisgo (Thailand) Co. Ltd.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
orders the applicant to pay the costs. |