This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/096/88
Case F-87/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 27 March 2007 — Manté v Council (Staff cases — Pay — Installation allowance — National expert on secondment who has been appointed an official — Recovery of sum not due — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case F-87/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 27 March 2007 — Manté v Council (Staff cases — Pay — Installation allowance — National expert on secondment who has been appointed an official — Recovery of sum not due — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case F-87/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 27 March 2007 — Manté v Council (Staff cases — Pay — Installation allowance — National expert on secondment who has been appointed an official — Recovery of sum not due — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 96, 28.4.2007, p. 42–42
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.4.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 96/42 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 27 March 2007 — Manté v Council
(Case F-87/06) (1)
(Staff cases - Pay - Installation allowance - National expert on secondment who has been appointed an official - Recovery of sum not due - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2007/C 96/88)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Thierry Manté (Woluw-Saint-Pierre, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Simm and I. Sulce, acting as Agents)
Re:
First, annulment of the decision of the Council's Appointing Authority of 22 August 2005 refusing to grant the applicant, a former national expert on secondment who became an official of the European Communities, the installation allowance and ordering its recovery, and secondly, an application for damages.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible; |
|
2. |
the Council of the European Union, in addition to bearing its own costs, is ordered to pay half those of Mr Manté. |
(1) OJ C 237 of 30.9.2006, p. 19.