EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/095/101
Case T-63/07: Action brought on 1 march 2007 — Mülhens v OHIM — Exportaciones Aceiteras Fedeoliva (tosca de FEDEOLIVA)
Case T-63/07: Action brought on 1 march 2007 — Mülhens v OHIM — Exportaciones Aceiteras Fedeoliva (tosca de FEDEOLIVA)
Case T-63/07: Action brought on 1 march 2007 — Mülhens v OHIM — Exportaciones Aceiteras Fedeoliva (tosca de FEDEOLIVA)
OJ C 95, 28.4.2007, p. 50–51
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.4.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 95/50 |
Action brought on 1 march 2007 — Mülhens v OHIM — Exportaciones Aceiteras Fedeoliva (tosca de FEDEOLIVA)
(Case T-63/07)
(2007/C 95/101)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Mülhens GmbH & Co. KG (Köln, Germany) (represented by: D. Eickemeier, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Exportaciones Aceiteras Fedeoliva, A. I. E. (Jaen, Spain)
Form of order sought
|
— |
Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the defendant dated 18 December 2006 in Case R 761/2006-2; |
|
— |
reject the application of the Community trade mark No 3 467 651. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for the Community trade mark: Exportaciones Aceiteras Fedeoliva, A. I. E.
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative Community trademark ‘tosca de FEDEOLIVA ’for goods and services in classes 16, 29, 35 and 39 Application No 3 467 651
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
Mark or sign cited: The community and national word marks ‘TOSCA ’for goods and services in class 3 (perfumeries, essential oils, non-medicated toilet preparations and cosmetics, preparations for hair, toothpastes, toilet soaps)
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b), 8(2)(c) and 8(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (‘CTMR’) and of the essential procedural requirements enshrined in Articles 43(1), 73 and 74(1)(2) of the CTMR.