EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/095/99
Case T-61/07: Action brought on 26 February 2007 — Italian Republic v Commission
Case T-61/07: Action brought on 26 February 2007 — Italian Republic v Commission
Case T-61/07: Action brought on 26 February 2007 — Italian Republic v Commission
OJ C 95, 28.4.2007, p. 49–50
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
28.4.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 95/49 |
Action brought on 26 February 2007 — Italian Republic v Commission
(Case T-61/07)
(2007/C 95/99)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: P. Gentili, Avvocato dello Stato)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul memorandum No 12244 of 14.12.2006 of the European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy — Programmes and projects in Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta and the Netherlands — concerning payments by the Commission which differ from the amount requested. Ref. Programma DOCUP Lazio (No CCI 2000 IT 162 DO 009); |
— |
annul memorandum No 12528 of 19.12.2006 of the European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy — Programmes and projects in Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta and the Netherlands — concerning payments by the Commission which differ from the amount requested. Ref. Programma DOCUP Piemonte (No CCI 2000 IT 162 DO 007); |
— |
annul memorandum No 12558 of 20.12.2006 of the European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy — Programmes and projects in Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta and the Netherlands — concerning payments by the Commission which differ from the amount requested. Ref. Programma POR Puglia (No CCI 1999 IT 161 PO 009); |
— |
annul memorandum No 00321 of 16.1.2007 of the European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy — Programmes and projects in Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta and the Netherlands — concerning payments by the Commission which differ from the amount requested. Ref. Programma DOCUP Lazio (No CCI 2000 IT 162 DO 009); |
— |
annul memorandum No 00322 of 16.1.2007 of the European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy — Programmes and projects in Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta and the Netherlands — concerning certification of the intermediate statement of expenses and claim for payment. Ref. DOCUP Veneto Ob. 2 2000-2006 (No CCI 2000 IT 162 DO 005); |
— |
annul memorandum No 00324 of 16.1.2007 of the European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy — Programmes and projects in Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta and the Netherlands — concerning payments by the Commission which differ from the amount requested. Ref. Programma POR Sardegna 2000-2006 (No CCI 1999 IT 161 PO 010); |
— |
annul memorandum No 00325 of 16.1.2007 of the European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy — Programmes and projects in Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta and the Netherlands — concerning payments by the Commission which differ from the amount requested. Ref. Programma POR Campania 2000-2006 (No CCI 1999 IT 161 PO 007); |
— |
annul memorandum No 00425 of 18.1.2007 of the European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy — Programmes and projects in Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta and the Netherlands — concerning payments by the Commission which differ from the amount requested. Ref. Programma DOCUP Toscana Ob. 2 (No CCI 1999 IT 162 DO 001); |
— |
annul memorandum No 00427 of 18.1.2007 of the European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy — Programmes and projects in Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta and the Netherlands — concerning payments by the Commission which differ from the amount requested. Ref. Programma POR Puglia (No CCI 1999 IT 161 PO 009); |
— |
annul all related and prior acts and, consequently, order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-345/04 Italy v Commission (1).
(1) OJ C 262, 23.10.04, p. 55.