EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/095/80
Case T-364/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 March 2007 — Saint-Gobain Pam v OHIM — Propamsa (PAM PLUVIAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark PAM PLUVIAL — Earlier national figurative marks PAM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Proof of use — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 43 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Case T-364/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 March 2007 — Saint-Gobain Pam v OHIM — Propamsa (PAM PLUVIAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark PAM PLUVIAL — Earlier national figurative marks PAM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Proof of use — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 43 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Case T-364/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 March 2007 — Saint-Gobain Pam v OHIM — Propamsa (PAM PLUVIAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark PAM PLUVIAL — Earlier national figurative marks PAM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Proof of use — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 43 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
OJ C 95, 28.4.2007, p. 40–40
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.4.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 95/40 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 March 2007 — Saint-Gobain Pam v OHIM — Propamsa (PAM PLUVIAL)
(Case T-364/05) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark PAM PLUVIAL - Earlier national figurative marks PAM - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Proof of use - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 43 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
(2007/C 95/80)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Saint-Gobain Pam SA (Nancy, France) (represented by: J. Blanchard and G. Marchais, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Rassat, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Propamsa, SA (Barcelona, Spain)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 April 2005 (Case R 414/2004-4) concerning registration of the word mark PAM PLUVIAL and relating to opposition proceedings between Propamsa, SA and Saint-Gobain Pam SA.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders the applicant, Saint-Gobain Pam SA, to pay the costs. |