EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2007/095/76

Case T-339/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 March 2007 — France Télécom v Commission (Competition — Decision ordering an inspection — Loyal cooperation with the national courts — Loyal cooperation with the national competition authorities — Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Commission Notice on Cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities — Statement of reasons — Proportionality)

OJ C 95, 28.4.2007, p. 38–38 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

28.4.2007   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/38


Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 March 2007 — France Télécom v Commission

(Case T-339/04) (1)

(Competition - Decision ordering an inspection - Loyal cooperation with the national courts - Loyal cooperation with the national competition authorities - Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Commission Notice on Cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities - Statement of reasons - Proportionality)

(2007/C 95/76)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: France Télécom SA, formerly Wanadoo SA (Paris, France) (represented by: H. Calvet and M.-C. Rameau, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier and O. Beynet, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision C (2004) 1929 of 18 May 2004 in Case COMP/C-1.38.916 ordering French Eélécom SA and all undertakings which it controls directly or indirectly, including Wanadoo SA and all undertakings controlled directly or indirectly by Wanadoo SA, to submit to an inspection pursuant to Article 20(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2003 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 [EC] and 82 [EC] (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the application;

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.


Top