EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/095/22
Case C-171/06 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 March 2007 — T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve diş Ticaret AŞ v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Figurative mark — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier national trade mark — Likelihood of confusion)
Case C-171/06 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 March 2007 — T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve diş Ticaret AŞ v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Figurative mark — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier national trade mark — Likelihood of confusion)
Case C-171/06 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 March 2007 — T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve diş Ticaret AŞ v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Figurative mark — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier national trade mark — Likelihood of confusion)
OJ C 95, 28.4.2007, p. 13–14
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.4.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 95/13 |
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 March 2007 — T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve diş Ticaret AŞ v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA
(Case C-171/06 P) (1)
(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Figurative mark - Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier national trade mark - Likelihood of confusion)
(2007/C 95/22)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve diş Ticaret AŞ (represented by: M. Francetti and F. Jacobacci, avvocati)
Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard Monguiral and J. Novais Gonçalves, Agents), Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA (represented by: J.-P. Simon, avocet)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 January 2005 in Case T-147/03 Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)(OHIM) annulling, upon application by the proprietor of the national figurative mark QUANTIEME for goods in Classes 14 and 18, Decision R 109/2002-3 of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 January 2003 which annulled the decision of the Opposition Division refusing registration of the figurative Community trade mark QUANTUM for goods in Class 14
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve diş Ticaret AŞ to pay the costs. |