EUR-Lex Přístup k právu Evropské unie
Tento dokument je výňatkem z internetových stránek EUR-Lex
Dokument C2007/082/08
Case C-270/05: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 February 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arios Pagos — Greece) — Athinaiki Chartopoiia AE v L. Panagiotidis and Others (Collective redundancies — Council Directive 98/59/EC — Article 1(1)(a) — Termination of the establishment's activities of the employer's own volition — Concept of establishment )
Case C-270/05: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 February 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arios Pagos — Greece) — Athinaiki Chartopoiia AE v L. Panagiotidis and Others (Collective redundancies — Council Directive 98/59/EC — Article 1(1)(a) — Termination of the establishment's activities of the employer's own volition — Concept of establishment )
Case C-270/05: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 February 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arios Pagos — Greece) — Athinaiki Chartopoiia AE v L. Panagiotidis and Others (Collective redundancies — Council Directive 98/59/EC — Article 1(1)(a) — Termination of the establishment's activities of the employer's own volition — Concept of establishment )
OJ C 82, 14.4.2007, s. 5—5
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
14.4.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 82/5 |
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 February 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arios Pagos — Greece) — Athinaiki Chartopoiia AE v L. Panagiotidis and Others
(Case C-270/05) (1)
(Collective redundancies - Council Directive 98/59/EC - Article 1(1)(a) - Termination of the establishment's activities of the employer's own volition - Concept of ‘establishment’)
(2007/C 82/08)
Language of the case: Greek
Referring court
Arios Pagos
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Athinaiki Chartopoiia AE
Defendant: L. Panagiotidis and Others
Intervener: Geniki Sinomospondia Ergaton Elladas (GSEE)
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Arios Pagos — Interpretation of Article 1(2)(d) of Council Directive 75/129/EEC of 17 February 1975 (OJ 1975 L 48, p. 29), Article 2(4) of Council Directive 92/56/EEC of 24 June 1992 (OJ 1992 L 245, p. 3) and Article 4(4) of Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 (OJ 1998 L 225, p. 16), on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies — Employer's obligation to inform and consult with the workers' representatives — Scope of the derogating conditions governing dismissals where activities are terminated following a judicial decision
Operative part of the judgment
Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies, in particular Article 1(1)(a), is to be interpreted as meaning that a production unit such as that at issue in the main proceedings comes within the concept of ‘establishment ’for the purposes of the application of that directive.