Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2007/082/92

    Case T-34/07: Action brought on 7 February 2007 — Goncharov v OHIM — DSB (DSBW)

    OJ C 82, 14.4.2007, p. 43–43 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    14.4.2007   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 82/43

    Action brought on 7 February 2007 — Goncharov v OHIM — DSB (DSBW)

    (Case T-34/07)

    (2007/C 82/92)

    Language in which the application was lodged: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Karen Goncharov (Moscow, Russian Federation) (represented by: G. Hasselblatt und A. Späth, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: DSB (Copenhagen, Denmark)

    Form of order sought

    —

    Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trademarks and Designs) (OHIM) of 4 December 2006 (Case R 1330/2005-2);

    —

    Order OHIM to pay its own costs and those of the applicant;

    —

    Order DSB, should it intervene in the proceedings, to pay its own costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for a Community trade mark: Karen Goncharov.

    Community trade mark concerned: The word mark DSBW for services in Classes 39, 41, 43 and 44 (Application No 2 852 143).

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: DSB

    Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark DSB (Community trade mark No 2 292 290) for services in Classes 35-37, 39, 41 and 42, whereas the opposition was directed against registration in Classes 39, 41 and 43.

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of Opposition.

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the contested decision and grant of the appeal.

    Pleas in law: The Board of Appeal wrongly finds that the registration of the mark DSBW is precluded by Article 8(1) (b) of Regulation 40/94; (1) there is no likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.

    (1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

    Top