EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/082/85
Case T-124/06: Order of the Court of First Instance of 24 January 2007 — MIP Metro v OHIM — MetroRED Telecom (MetroRED) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-124/06: Order of the Court of First Instance of 24 January 2007 — MIP Metro v OHIM — MetroRED Telecom (MetroRED) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-124/06: Order of the Court of First Instance of 24 January 2007 — MIP Metro v OHIM — MetroRED Telecom (MetroRED) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 82, 14.4.2007, p. 38–38
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
14.4.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 82/38 |
Order of the Court of First Instance of 24 January 2007 — MIP Metro v OHIM — MetroRED Telecom (MetroRED)
(Case T-124/06) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - No need to adjudicate)
(2007/C 82/85)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: R. Kaase, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: MetroRED Telecom Group Ltd (Hamilton, Bermuda)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 February 2006 (Case R 266/2005-2), relating to opposition proceedings between MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG and MetroRED Telecom Group Ltd.
Operative part of the judgment
1. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
2. |
Each party shall bear its own costs. |