EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/082/69
Case T-175/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 February 2007 — Gordon v Commission (Officials — Action for annulment — Career development report — Total and permanent invalidity — No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate — Actions for damages — Inadmissibility)
Case T-175/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 February 2007 — Gordon v Commission (Officials — Action for annulment — Career development report — Total and permanent invalidity — No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate — Actions for damages — Inadmissibility)
Case T-175/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 February 2007 — Gordon v Commission (Officials — Action for annulment — Career development report — Total and permanent invalidity — No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate — Actions for damages — Inadmissibility)
OJ C 82, 14.4.2007, p. 32–32
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
14.4.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 82/32 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 February 2007 — Gordon v Commission
(Case T-175/04) (1)
(Officials - Action for annulment - Career development report - Total and permanent invalidity - No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate - Actions for damages - Inadmissibility)
(2007/C 82/69)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Donal Gordon (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially M. Byrne, solicitor, and subsequently J. Sambon and P.-P. Van Gehuchten and P. Reyniers, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents)
Re:
Action, first, for annulment of the decision of 11 December 2003 rejecting the complaint concerning the decision of 28 April 2003 confirming the applicant's career development report for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002, and, secondly, for compensation for the damage suffered by the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Declares that there is no longer any need to rule on the application for annulment; |
|
2. |
Dismisses the action for damages as inadmissible; |
|
3. |
Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |