Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2007/082/22

    Case C-302/06: Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling of the Krajský súd v Prešove, Slovak Republic) — František Koval'ský v Mesto Prešov, Dopravný podnik Mesta Prešov, a.s. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protocol to the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms — Property law — Electrical installations on private land without compensation for the owners — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

    OJ C 82, 14.4.2007, p. 11–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    14.4.2007   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 82/11


    Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling of the Krajský súd v Prešove, Slovak Republic) — František Koval'ský v Mesto Prešov, Dopravný podnik Mesta Prešov, a.s.

    (Case C-302/06) (1)

    (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protocol to the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms - Property law - Electrical installations on private land without compensation for the owners - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

    (2007/C 82/22)

    Language of the case: Slovak

    Referring court

    Krajský súd v Prešove

    Parties

    Applicant: František Koval'ský

    Defendants: Mesto Prešov, Dopravný podnik Mesta Prešov, a.s.

    Intevernors: Zuzana Petrová, Ondrej Valla

    Re:

    Reference for a preliminary ruling — Krajský súd v Prešove — Interpretation of Article 6 EU and Article 1 of the Protocol to the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Paris on 20 March 1952 — Property law — National legislation under which electrical installations may be placed on private land without the owners being entitled to compensation

    Operative part of the order

    The Court of Justice of the European Communities clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Krajský súd v Prešove V by decisions of 2 May and 21 July 2006.


    (1)  OJ C 249 of 14.10.2006.


    Top