Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2007/069/56

    Case T-29/07: Action brought on 9 February 2007 — Lactalis Gestion Lait and Lactalis Investissements v Council

    OJ C 69, 24.3.2007, p. 27–27 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    24.3.2007   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 69/27


    Action brought on 9 February 2007 — Lactalis Gestion Lait and Lactalis Investissements v Council

    (Case T-29/07)

    (2007/C 69/56)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicants: Lactalis Gestion Lait and Lactalis Investissements (Laval, France) (represented by: A. Philippart, lawyer)

    Defendant: Council of the European Union

    Form of order sought

    rule that the first subparagraph of Article 1 of Council Directive 67/227/EEC, read in the light of the fourth recital in the preamble, requires the Member States to abolish and replace cumulative multi-stage turnover taxes which distort competition and hinder trade between Member States;

    rule that subparagraph 3 of Article 1 of Directive 67/227/EEC, read in the light of the eighth recital in the preamble, prohibits Member States (old or new) from maintaining or introducing measure providing for flat-rate equalisation of turnover taxes on importation or exportation in trade between Member States;

    rule that Article 1 of First Directive 67/227/EEC replaces cumulative multi-stage taxes with the common system of value added tax and that henceforward the maintenance or introduction of cumulative multi-stage taxes which distort competition and hinder trade must be prohibited;

    rule that contrary to the objective that it set, Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, by repealing First Directive 67/227/EEC, gives, with the exception of Article 2 defining the characteristics of VAT, an incomplete and incorrect image of the existing VAT legislation and jeopardises the harmonisation of laws on turnover tax;

    rule that by removing all references to the principle of principle of the prohibition on cumulative multi-stage taxes and thereby enabling the maintenance and reintroduction of turnover taxes of such a kind as to distort competition and hinder trade between Member States, the Council infringes the objectives set by Articles 3 and 93 EC and directly and individually affects the applicants' interests;

    annul Article 411/1 of Directive 2006/112/EC in so far as it repeals recitals 4 and 8 and subparagraphs 1 and 3 of Article 1 of Council Directive 67/227/EEC and clearly infringes Articles 3 and 93 EC;

    order the Council to reimburse the irrecoverable expenses incurred in these proceedings

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    By this action, the applicants seek annulment of Article 411/1 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) in so far as it repeals subparagraphs 1 and 3 of Article 1 of First Council Directive 67/227/EEC of 11 April 1967 on the harmonisation of legislation of Member States concerning turnover taxes (2) providing for the abolition and prohibiting the maintenance or introduction of cumulative multi-stage taxes.

    The applicants claim that by adopting such a directive, the Council infringes the objectives of the Treaty set out in Articles 3 and 93 EC which provide for the harmonisation of laws on turnover taxes. The applicants also submit that the repeal of Directive 67/227/EEC by Directive 2006/112/EC calls into question the principle of the prohibition on cumulative multi-stage taxes which the applicants argue are, by their very nature, of such a kind as to distort the conditions of competition and hinder trade between Member States.


    (1)  OJ L 347, 2006, p. 1.

    (2)  OJ L 71, 2006, p. 1301.


    Top