Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/326/155

    Case T-329/06: Action brought on 27 November 2006 — Enercon GmbH v OHIM

    OJ C 326, 30.12.2006, p. 76–76 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    30.12.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 326/76


    Action brought on 27 November 2006 — Enercon GmbH v OHIM

    (Case T-329/06)

    (2006/C 326/155)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Enercon GmbH (Aurich, Germany) (represented by R. Böhm, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 September 2006 (Case R 0394/2006-1);

    order the defendant to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘E’ for goods in Classes 7, 9 and 19 (application No 3 817 566)

    Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of the application

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) as it was held that the mark for which registration was sought lacked distinctive character and that its availability had to be preserved.


    (1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).


    Top