Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2006/326/139

    Case T-312/06: Action brought on 17 November 2006 – FMC Chemical v EFSA

    OJ C 326, 30.12.2006, p. 66–67 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    30.12.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 326/66

    Action brought on 17 November 2006– FMC Chemical v EFSA

    (Case T-312/06)

    (2006/C 326/139)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: FMC Chemical SPRL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mereu, K. Van Maldegem, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

    Form of order sought

    —

    Declare the present application admissible and well founded;

    —

    annul the EFSA's Conclusion Report, titled ‘Conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Carbosuflan’;

    —

    order the EFSA and/or the European Commission by way of incidental request in accordance with Articles 63 and 64 of the Court's Rules of Procedure, to produce the proposal regarding the (non) inclusion of Carbosuflan in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC it intends to present to the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health for a vote at its 22/24 November 2006 meeting, or any other meeting;

    —

    declare the illegality and inapplicability vis-à-vis the applicant and the review of their Carbosuflan dossiers of Article 20 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002;

    —

    order the defendant to compensate the applicants for the damages incurred as a result of the contested measure, and to hold at this stage by interlocutory statement that the defendant is obliged to compensate the applicants for the damages they incurred and to reserve the fixing of the amount of compensation either by agreement between the parties or by the Court in the absence of such agreement;

    —

    order the defendant to pay the costs and expenses in these proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The pleas in law and the main arguments raised by the applicant are identical to those relied on in Case T-311/06, FMC Chemical et Arysta Lifesciences v European Food Safety Authority.

    Top