Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2006/154/59

    Case F-47/06: Action brought on 8 May 2006 — Aimi and Others v Commission

    OJ C 154, 1.7.2006, p. 25–26 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    1.7.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 154/25

    Action brought on 8 May 2006 — Aimi and Others v Commission

    (Case F-47/06)

    (2006/C 154/59)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicants: Naomi Aimi (Evere, Belgium) and Others (represented by: A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

    Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

    Form of order sought

    —

    annul the individual decisions rejecting the applicants' requests that the appointing authority adopt transitional measures in order to ensure, in the context of the 2005 and subsequent promotion exercises, equal treatment and their acquired rights;

    —

    order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of their application, the applicants claim that in rejecting their requests that it adopt transitional measures with the aim of taking account of their individual situations resulting from the creation of supplementary grades, the defendant disregarded their right to reasonable career prospects in the same conditions as their colleagues in the same category and also their acquired rights, in so far as their career prospects were significantly altered.

    The applicants further plead an absence of relevant reasons, in that the defendant did not respond to the pleas and arguments set out in their requests and complaints.

    Top