EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/154/08
Case C-322/05 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 February 2006 — Hippocrate Vounakis v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Officials — Promotion — Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations — Complaint — Time-limits — Appeal manifestly unfounded)
Case C-322/05 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 February 2006 — Hippocrate Vounakis v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Officials — Promotion — Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations — Complaint — Time-limits — Appeal manifestly unfounded)
Case C-322/05 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 February 2006 — Hippocrate Vounakis v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Officials — Promotion — Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations — Complaint — Time-limits — Appeal manifestly unfounded)
OJ C 154, 1.7.2006, p. 4–4
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
1.7.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 154/4 |
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 February 2006 — Hippocrate Vounakis v Commission of the European Communities
(Case C-322/05 P) (1)
(Appeal - Officials - Promotion - Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations - Complaint - Time-limits - Appeal manifestly unfounded)
(2006/C 154/08)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Hippocrate Vounakis (represented by: S. Orlandi, avocat)
Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and C. Berardis-Keyser, Agents)
Re:
Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 2 June 2005 in Case T-326/03 Vounakis v Commission rejecting, as inadmissible, an application to annul the decision of the Commission not to promote the appellant to grade A4 in the 2002 promotion exercise
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed; |
|
2. |
Mr Vounakis is ordered to pay the costs. |