Изберете експерименталните функции, които искате да изпробвате

Този документ е извадка от уебсайта EUR-Lex.

Документ C2006/131/25

    Case C-234/04: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 March 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling of Landesgericht Innsbruck (Austria)) — Rosmarie Kapferer v Schlank & Schick GmbH (Jurisdiction in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Interpretation of Article 15 — Jurisdiction over consumer contracts — Prize notification — Misleading advertising — Judgment on jurisdiction — Res judicata — Review on appeal — Legal certainty — Primacy of Community law — Article 10 EC)

    OJ C 131, 3.6.2006г., стр. 14—15 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    3.6.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 131/14


    Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 March 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling of Landesgericht Innsbruck (Austria)) — Rosmarie Kapferer v Schlank & Schick GmbH

    (Case C-234/04) (1)

    (Jurisdiction in civil matters - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Interpretation of Article 15 - Jurisdiction over consumer contracts - Prize notification - Misleading advertising - Judgment on jurisdiction - Res judicata - Review on appeal - Legal certainty - Primacy of Community law - Article 10 EC)

    (2006/C 131/25)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Landesgericht Innsbruck (Austria)

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Rosmarie Kapferer

    Defendant: Schlank & Schick GmbH

    Re:

    REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling — Landesgericht Innsbruck — Interpretation of Art. I0 EC — Duty of court of appeal to review and set aside a final first instance judicial decision on jurisdiction where there is an infringement of Community law — Interpretation of Art. 15(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/100 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgements in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p.1) — National law on consumer protection providing for a right to the prize supposedly won by the addressee of misleading advertising.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The principle of cooperation under Article 10 EC does not require a national court to disapply its internal rules of procedure in order to review and set aside a final judicial decision if that decision should be contrary to Community law.


    (1)  OJ C 251 of 09.10.2004.


    Нагоре